Fathering Magazine for fathers, dads, family


NOTICE: Most recent site content is not available to users of ad blockers.

Home
What's New
Beginners' Tour
True Stories
True Soap
Health

Topics
New Fathers
The Joy of Fathering
Importance of Fathers
Fathers & Sons
Fathers & Daughters
Single Fathers
Second Wives -
   Second Families
Gender & Fathers
Custody & Divorce
Father Custody
Child Support
Exposé
Cyber Bullying
Sex Bullies
Family Vacation
Father's Day
Mother's Day

Sections
Book Reviews
Fathering Poems
Interviews
Fathering Fiction
Cooking Recipes
Science Fair Project
US Constitution

News
Female Offenders
Juvenile Offenders

Child Health
New Baby
Premature
Circumcision
Intersex
Signs of Puberty
Car Hazards
Child Obesity
Teen Smoking
Teen Drinking
ADD/ADHD
PCOS
Autism

Men's Health
Hair Loss
Muse ED Review
Vasectomy
Micturition
Restoration

Columns
Stephen Baskerville
Michael Childers
Kirk Daulerio
John Gill
Paul Goetz
Sam Harper
Jim Loose
Mark Phillips
Fred Reed
Carey Roberts
Glenn Sacks
Clyde Verner
Archie Wortham

Exposé
Child Support Policy
Child Support Math
Commercial Justice
Abuse Hysteria
Missing Child Money
Gender Equality?

Legal Disclaimer





Except where otherwise indicated, the contents of this page are copyright
© 1995 - 2018 FatherMag.com
All rights reserved.

Home > Child Custody & Divorce > Item

Social Workers Not Immune from Prosecution


>Date: Sat, 20 Apr 1996 10:00:52 -0400 (EDT)
>From: American Fathers Coalition 
>To: American Fathers Coalition 
>Subject: LCSW Immunity victory for us! (fwd)
>
>From: Stuart Miller 
>To: American Fathers Coalition 
>
>SOCIAL WORKERS NOT IMMUNE
Tomlin v. McKenzie - VA S.Ct. Record No. 951427 - Koontz, J. 4/19/96

The Virginia Supreme Court, on April 19, 1996, just ruled that social workers DO NOT have 11th amendment immunity for "acts which constitute wanton and intentional deviation from the duties the agent has been assigned to undertake..." Further the Supremos held that misconduct is "perhaps even more egregious if one were subjected to it under a court-ordered referral."

In the case at bar, the father (a lawyer) on behalf of himself and as next-friend for his current wife and his daughter filed a three-count motion for judgement against a licensed clinical social worker who provided family therapy under a court ordered referral. The suit asks for $11 million in compensatory damages and $350,000 in punitive damages.

The following is what I have been told about the case:

The therapist when setting up a video camera for an interview with the child accidentally turned on the camera. The camera recorded the therapist explaining to the ex-wife and the child how to make up and phrase false-allegations of abuse by the father.





The therapist then thought she was turning the camera on and conducted the phony interview and sent a copy of the tape off to the father... complete with her instructions on how to make false allegations! BUSTED!

This is a major victory for us... and when the case is over, the tape will be invaluable in showing legislators what often really happens when the "child savers" go to work to "get a dad"

Keep fighting and keep the evidence coming to us. We are making a difference!

Andy Duncan
dadman@sound.net

One half of all parents are fathers.

Courtesy of Fathers' Manifesto.

Copyright © 1996
FatherMag.com. All rights reserved.

more Fathering news stories



fathermag.com
The on-line magazine for men with families.



















US