Now in two editions:
Home Life   <-|->  Home Strife

Search all of FatherMag
for your topic of interest

Featured Sections
 Home
 What's New
 Beginners' Tour
 True Stories
 The Male Body

Topic Indexes
 The Joy of Fathering
 Importance of Fathers
 Fathers & Sons
 Fathers & Daughters
 Custody & Divorce
 Child Support
 Single Fathers
 Second Wives -
      Second Families


 Fathering News
 Fathering Forum
 Fathering Poetry
 Fathering Fiction


Advertise on
fathermag.com



See the daily updates to this site by adding it to your Wikio feed, or your Yahoo or Google page:

Add to Google

http://www.wikio.com





Paternité
La paternité est un homme le plus important travail.

The Fertile Monk
Becoming a dad is a bit like becoming a monk. It requires devotion.

Survival
means protecting our freedom from ever more powerful government agents.


Except where otherwise indicated, the contents of this page are copyright
© 1995 - 2008 Fathering Enterprises.
All rights reserved.



Child Support System
Declared Unconstitutional

Minnesota Supreme Court upholds ruling


In 1975, Congress passed a law which included a last minute amendment to create the Office of Child Support Enforcement (OCSE). When signing the bill, then President Ford commented that it took the federal government too far into domestic relations and promised to propose legislation to correct the problem. Over the decade that followed, it became clear that OCSE intended to grow in size and power to control all aspects of child support law, seizing that power from the state courts.

The size of the OCSE grew, this decade acquiring a staff in excess of 50,000 and costing taxpayers some $3 billion annually. Child support laws were modified, so that simple mathematical formulae are used to make award decisions. This new simplicity is required due to the low level of education of workers who are assigned as "judges" in child support cases. Extreme consequences defined by new federal laws, often carried out automatically and without trial, give the child support enforcement agency power over tens of millions of individuals that surpasses anything previously seen in the United States.

After almost 25 years since its start, judges in Minnesota finally felt that they had seen enough. In June of last year, the Court of Appeals decided that the administrative branch of government had exceeded its constitutional powers.



(page continues below)

remember, FatherMag.com now comes in two editions:
Home Life   <-|->  Home Strife



"The administrative child support process governed by Minn. Stat. 518.5511 (1996) is unconstitutional because it violates the separation of powers required by Minn. Const. art. III, 1." (STATE OF MINNESOTA IN COURT OF APPEALS C7-97-926 C8-97-1132 C7-97-1512 C8-98-33, Filed June 12, 1998; http://www.courts.state.mn.us/library/archive/ctappub/9806/c797926.htm)

The Minnesota Supreme Court upheld the decision in January of this year.

"The administrative child support process created by Minn. Stat. 518.5511 (1996) violates the separation of powers doctrine by infringing on the district court's original jurisdiction, by creating a tribunal which is not inferior to the district court, and by permitting child support officers to practice law. Therefore, the statute is unconstitutional." (STATE OF MINNESOTA IN SUPREME COURT C7-97-926 C8-97-1132 C9-98-33 C7-97-1512, Filed: January 28, 1999, Office of Appellate Courts; http://www.courts.state.mn.us/library/archive/supct/9901/c797926.htm)

--Reported by Roger F. Gay

Back to FatherMag News Page

more Fathering news stories






fathermag.com
The on-line magazine for men with families.







Legal Disclaimer

Powered by
BindNine.net