Fathering Magazine for fathers, dads, family


NOTICE: Most recent site content is not available to users of ad blockers.

Home
What's New
Beginners' Tour
True Stories
True Soap
Health

Topics
New Fathers
The Joy of Fathering
Importance of Fathers
Fathers & Sons
Fathers & Daughters
Single Fathers
Second Wives -
   Second Families
Gender & Fathers
Custody & Divorce
Father Custody
Child Support
Exposé
Cyber Bullying
Sex Bullies
Family Vacation
Father's Day
Mother's Day

Sections
Book Reviews
Fathering Poems
Interviews
Fathering Fiction
Cooking Recipes
Science Fair Project
US Constitution

News
Female Offenders
Juvenile Offenders

Child Health
New Baby
Premature
Circumcision
Intersex
Signs of Puberty
Car Hazards
Child Obesity
Teen Smoking
Teen Drinking
ADD/ADHD
PCOS
Autism

Men's Health
Hair Loss
Muse ED Review
Vasectomy
Micturition
Restoration

Columns
Stephen Baskerville
Michael Childers
Kirk Daulerio
John Gill
Paul Goetz
Sam Harper
Jim Loose
Mark Phillips
Fred Reed
Carey Roberts
Glenn Sacks
Clyde Verner
Archie Wortham

Exposé
Child Support Policy
Child Support Math
Commercial Justice
Abuse Hysteria
Missing Child Money
Gender Equality?

Legal Disclaimer





Except where otherwise indicated, the contents of this page are copyright
© 1995 - 2017 FatherMag.com
All rights reserved.

Repressed Memory patient Elizabeth Carlson Wins $ 2.5 million!

PRESS RELEASE: St. Paul, Minnesota At the conclusion of what many national experts believe is the longest psychiatric malpractice trial in U.S. history, a St. Paul jury today awarded $2.5 million to a Minnesota woman and her family for injuries suffered as a result of negligent psychotherapy to recover so-called "repressed memories". During the trial, the plaintiffs, Elizabeth, David, and Lisha Carlson, as well as several local and national experts in memory and psychiatry, argued that the defendant, Dr. Diane Bay Humenansky - had implanted false memories of childhood sexual abuse. The jury apparently agreed.

This trial was the second in an ongoing series of malpractice cases filed against Dr. Mumenansky, a St. Paul psychiatrist who employed a controversial treatment known as "recovered memory therapy". In August of 1995, Vynnette Hamanne - another St. Paul native - and her family were awarded $2.67 million as a result of similar claims against Dr. Humanansky. The Hamanne verdict is generally believed to be the largest psychotherapy negligence award in U.S. history.

During both the Carlson and Hamanne trials, Dr. Humenansky and her defense experts testified that hypnosis, drugs, coercion, group pressure and suggestion cannot produce horrific and compelling false memories. This theory was criticized in both cases by world renowned memory expert Prof. Elizabeth Loftus who also testified that the theory of "repressed memory" is a myth that is unsupported by reliable scientific evidence. Prof. Richard Ofshe, a Pultizer Prize winner from the University of California similarly testified that "recovered memory therapy" is the "worst form of psychiatric quackery in the 20th century". "These reckless and dangerous therapists", Ofshe said, "have destroyed thousands of American families." University of Minnesota medical school and psychology faculty members, including Profs. Glenn Lewis, Keith Horton, Marian Hall, and William Grove testified that Dr. Humenansky's treatment methods were "reckless and dangerous" and had caused significant harm to the Carlson family.





During both trials, Ramsey County Judge Bertrand Poritsky - considered one of the most experienced and capable judges i the state - ruled that the theory that humans are capable of "repressing" or "dissociating" memories of numerous traumas in childhood was not a credible scientific theory and thus could not be presented to the jury.

R. Christopher Barden, Ph.D., J.D., a licensed psychologist and law professor, as well as the personal attorney for the Carlson family said that "the Carlson and Hamanne verdicts send a powerful message to psychotherapists that they must stop using untested and unproven methods on their patients." As President of the National Association for Consumer Protection in Mental Health Practices, Dr. Barden - who also serves on the Minnesota State Board of Psychology - issued the following statement:

"These cases demonstrate that therapists must obey the informed consent laws or face serious legal consequences. Bogus theories such as "repression" and unproven treatments for junkscience illnesses such as "multiple personality disorder" may not be used on American citizens until they have been proven safe and effective by reliable scientific research. Millions of dollars of taxpayers mone are wasted every year on these experimental and potentially dangerous forms of mental health treatment and it is time for such unethical practices to cease. Until the professional associations and licensing boards stop these dangerous practices, victims of quack psychotherapies will continue to turn to the courts for justice."

Through her personal attorney, R. Christopher Barden, plaintiff Elizabeth Carlson issued the following statement:

"This is an enormous step toward justice being served. It now seems clear that this long and difficult process will result in better protections for mental health consumers - It was all worth it. Hopefully now "repressed memory therapists" will stop destroying the livesof innocent families."

Like the Hamanne trial, the Carlson trial involved extensive discussions of scientific evidence regarding the nature of human memory, research on emotional responses to abuse and other traumas and methods for testing the effectiveness of various mental health treatments. Numerous memory and trauma experts testified that over a century of research supports the notion that human beings remember trauma and are, in fact, haunted b vivid memories of war, sexual abuse, rape, car accidents, and other forms of trauma. The notion that many people somehow "block out" or "repress" of "dissociate" the memories of such experiences is simply not supported by credible scientific evidence. The idea that therapists can help patients "recover" such "repressed" memories is simply junkscience, said the experts. Relying on this large and growing body of scientific evidence, courts in a number of states (Hungerford in New Hampshire; Maskell in Maryland; Engstrom in California; Hamanne in Minnesota; Carlson in Minnesota) have ruled that the theory of "repression" is a junkscience notion that may not be used to mislead or confuse juries.

The Carlson and Hamanne trials have engaged national attention with media coverage of one or both of these cases appearing on national TV and in numerous newspaper and magazine articles. With hundreds of "false memory" suits now pending, the national legal observers are looking to the Hamanne and Carlson cases - the most carefully and fully litigated of the cases to date - to establish the value of false memory suits throughout the nation.

"The Carlson case is factually the most difficult case for the plaintiff of all of the 30 or more cases I am involved with" said R. Christopher Barden, Carlson's lawyer and a national speaker and expert on "repressed memory" treatments and lawsuits. "If we can win this case we may be able to win them all. It is now time for the mental health professions to take the legal rights of patients more seriously and stop using unproven and untested experiemental treatments without adequate and informed consent."

The third trial against Dr. Humenansky is scheduled to begin in June, 1996.

--
Terry A. Dawson
Post Office Box 6183
Katy, Texas 77491-6183
Phone/Fax: 713-347-6183
E-Mail: tdawson@accesscomm.net

Courtesy of Fathers' Manifesto.


Copyright © 1996
FatherMag.com. All rights reserved.

more Intimate Violence news stories



fathermag.com
The on-line magazine for men with families.



















US