But that rendition of gender equality didn’t sit too well with the lavender ladies at WHO’s department of Gender, Women, and Health. They solved that problem by designing a study that – you guessed right again – only interviewed females.

This year three stalwart truth-tellers stood up to a tsunami of prevarication to make the short list for the 2005 Award for Political Incorrectness.

The rad-fems have devised a remarkable plan for family destablization: fabricate a bizarre accusation, get the media to believe it, whip the populace into a frenzy, and then pressure chivalrous legislators to pass laws that do away with fathers.

Fem-think insists that in patriarchal society, women are not only the biggest victims, women are its only victims. Despite the absurdity of that proposition, the gender warriors endlessly advance that idea. Repeat a lie a thousand times, and people begin to believe it.

There are two recent publications which affirm the abiding truth that fathers are one of our nations most treasured natural resources.

Noncombatant men have been and continue to be the most frequent targets of mass killing and genocidal slaughter.

The PBS producer figured that in the court of public opinion, the self-assured testimony of an immigrant mom, pitched to a group of dewy-eyed women and set against appropriate background music, would prevail over the cold truth of child abuse reports, depositions, and court decisions.

What VAWA does is to promote divorce and provide women with weapons, such as the restraining order and free legal assistance, to get sole custody of their children, Phyllis Schlafly warns. And sole custody equals many years of tax-free child support checks.

Every time a woman hits a hiccup in the long march for female emancipation, it seems that someone trots out the specter of knuckle-dragging males trying to send their womenfolk back to the Cuissinart.

So why would PBS engage in this wanton abuse of truth? The answer lies in the broader feminist crusade to overturn the Patriarchy. Get dad out of the picture, they say, and the children will grow up to be more enlightened human beings.

As communism began to take hold in Russia, newly-emancipated women pursued liaisons with wealthy men, with the aim of becoming pregnant and then suing the men for alimony.

Then there’s the truth-in-packaging issue. Some female politicians project an altar-girl image of enlightened centrism, all the while lobbying behind the scenes for radical leftist legislation.

Under old English law, when a wife over-spent the family budget, it was the husband who went to debtor’s prison. And during the 1800s, if an American woman committed a crime, it was her husband who did time.

It came as bad news to the hairy-leg ladies who care only about providing abortion services for 12-year-old girls.

Once you start to suggest that males are a menace to women you are undermining the basis of the traditional family.

Even the notion of truth itself has come under attack by postmodern feminism, which claims that truth is simply another tool for the patriarchal subjugation of women.

A quick run to the local mall reveals hordes of scantily-clad young females who are aggressively advertising their sexual charms. But when the subject turns to cohabitation, marriage advocates feel compelled to fall back on the old motif of male aggressors who ravish innocent virgins.

In Washington DC, news of the sexual assault of an officers wife triggered the spectacle of hundreds of uniformed sailors and soldiers who chased and beat Blacks, all within view of the US Capitol building. The sexual assault report later turned out to be a hoax.

The abuse of restraining orders has now become widespread. In Massachusetts, 30,000 restraining orders are issued each year.

Roberts argued against Title IX, the law that shuts down men's athletic teams because not enough women have been signing up for synchronized swimming.

The effects of these federal programs are predictable -- and tragic. Now, 16 million children live only with their mothers.

Norway has decreed that henceforth all companies will be obliged to meet a 40% female board quota – or else face closure.

The proponents of VAWA seek to weaken and ultimately reconfigure the traditional family.

Has anyone noticed that Constitutional protections of due process are being shredded by this near-hysteria over domestic violence?

The Sisterhood exploits women's vulnerabilities by playing on an easy sense of me-mania.

Years ago the rad-fems highjacked the federal Violence Against Women Act, and have relentlessly milked the issue to inflame the fears of women.

During the 1980s Pope John Paul II worked courageously and relentlessly behind the scenes to topple Polish Communism. Now Cardinal Ratzinger is picking up where John Paul left off, publicly denouncing the scourge of socialism.

Strange that a New York Times reporter would write a column about a ground-breaking report, but never reveal its title or tell us where to find it.

The Super Bowl Hoax, as it was later dubbed, no doubt will become a classic in the propaganda textbooks.

That two percent sex difference is greater than the biological gap between humans and chimpanzees. In other words, the built-in differences between men and women are akin to the dissimilarities between man and ape.

The rise of no-fault, unilateral divorce does not trouble the Sisterhood. In fact, they welcome it.

To Saint Hillary, the enemy is that vast penile conspiracy called the Patriarchy.

The femmes want to gender mainstream the rest of the UN. Gender mainstreaming is the process of assessing the implications for women and men of every planned action.

Something has gone terribly wrong. The health programs of the World Health Organization are violating the U.N.'s most cherished founding principles.

After listening all day to the ideological slogans, factual distortions, and emotional harangues, one almost begins to believe they are true. That’s how brainwashing works.

The vast majority of women who might otherwise qualify as public intellectuals would rather recite the feminist catechism or articulate some new twists and refinements on it.

The feminist catechism does not take well to apostasy, and it fell to one Susan Estrich to deliver the ex-communication. Estrich likely would have been John Kerrys first nomination to the United States Supreme Court.

But now, a whole generation of women has come to believe that all manner of lewd and indecent behavior is acceptable -- just so long as it can be justified with feminist buzz words such as “’liberation,’ ‘empowerment,’ and ‘choice.’

The marriage movement faces many challenges, not the least of which is that many men have come to believe that marriage is a raw deal. And we’re not talking about just a few malcontents.

But the American Heart Association didn’t even bother to survey men. Sometimes you almost have to feel sorry for those afflicted by political correctness, persons who are so easily taken in by their pat answers and delusions of gender enlightenment.

But the strangling of Bobbie Jo Stinnett by a deranged woman threatened to sabotage the over-arching message of the WP series: that pregnant women need stronger laws to protect them from the male menace.

Every era has its utopian movements that hold out the promise of social perfectability. One such movement is feminism, which claims the path to social nirvana is the liberation of women and the creation of a genderless society.

This study of TV directors raises some lingering questions. Were qualified male candidates being passed over because of their sex?

We have now passed the point of no return. Too many infants are warehoused in day care centers. Too many men have been unfairly stereotyped and falsely accused.