Fathering Magazine for fathers, dads, family

NOTICE: This website is FOR SALE. Buy Now!

What's New
Beginners' Tour
True Stories
True Soap

New Fathers
The Joy of Fathering
Importance of Fathers
Fathers & Sons
Fathers & Daughters
Single Fathers
Second Wives -
   Second Families
Gender & Fathers
Custody & Divorce
Father Custody
Child Support
Cyber Bullying
Sex Bullies
Family Vacation
Father's Day
Mother's Day

Book Reviews
Fathering Poems
Fathering Fiction
Cooking Recipes
Science Fair Project
US Constitution

Female Offenders
Juvenile Offenders

Child Health
New Baby
Signs of Puberty
Car Hazards
Child Obesity
Teen Smoking
Teen Drinking

Men's Health
Hair Loss
Muse ED Review

Stephen Baskerville
Michael Childers
Kirk Daulerio
John Gill
Paul Goetz
Sam Harper
Jim Loose
Mark Phillips
Fred Reed
Carey Roberts
Glenn Sacks
Clyde Verner
Archie Wortham

Child Support Policy
Child Support Math
Commercial Justice
Abuse Hysteria
Missing Child Money
Gender Equality?

Legal Disclaimer

Home > Importance of Fathers > Article

In Search of a History

by Richard Hiatt
Page five
Go to page one...

   In 1995, scholar Umberto Eco (child witness to Mussolinis national socialism) affixed the title of "Ur-Fascism" to many of the same symptoms evident today: "the rejection of modernism ... action for actions sake ...fear of difference ...appeal to a frustrated middle class ...obsession with a plot ...life is permanent warfare ...contempt for the weak ...the cult of heroism ...selective populism ...against rotten parliamentary governments." Eco warns that Ur-Fascism is still around, though in "plainclothes," in "the most innocent of disguises."

   What many Americans dont realize is that of all the neo-fascist activity heard today throughout the world, the vast bulk of pro-fascist literature comes from the US, not Europe. The old stereotype of the reverse is no longer true. European hate groups import it, its ideology and recruitment strategies, from cities like New York and Los Angeles.

   Which brings up another sobering reality: the fact that developing nations are taking their lead from the historical precedence set by the United States. They're following the codes and strictures leading to economic wealth and, predictably, at the expense of the poor and displaced. Enormous disparities exist between rich and poor, the weak and powerful.

   Hearing about sweatshops and child labor should make us feel accountable, not distantly judgmental and elitist. Countries in Asia and South America are only following the exemplar of "progress" as defined by US history. Why? Because the US won the biggest war in history, world history was instantly rewritten by "the winner," and the rules (or lack thereof) of free market industrial capitalism became regnant and supreme. And remember it was Alexander Hamilton who said that women and children were "rendered more useful ...[within] manufacturing establishments."

   Mexico's notorious maquiladora zone (the belt of low-wage factories along the Mexican border) fed by NAFTA is just one example. NAFTA has destabilized the Mexican peasantry, having forced it into cheap industrial labor. Thailand's peasantry is another example. Child labor and subminimum wages only follow the same conditions which occurred in the US for roughly the same reasons (cf. the LA garment industry and southern textile plants). The infamous shoe factories in Indonesia are another. And even Germany and Japan follow the imbalances of wealth distribution between rich and poor, even though both countries maintain a fairer distribution-ratio than even the US (6:1 and 4:1 versus 9:1 in the US - rich to poor).

The Preamble, the Declaration of Independence, and the Gettysburg Address are "the sacred scriptures of this nation,"

Copyright © 1998 Richard Hiatt. All rights reserved.

Other articles...

The on-line magazine for men with families.