Fathering Magazine for fathers, dads, family


NOTICE: Most recent site content is not available to users of ad blockers.

Home
What's New
Beginners' Tour
True Stories
True Soap
Health

Topics
New Fathers
The Joy of Fathering
Importance of Fathers
Fathers & Sons
Fathers & Daughters
Single Fathers
Second Wives -
   Second Families
Gender & Fathers
Custody & Divorce
Father Custody
Child Support
Exposé
Cyber Bullying
Sex Bullies
Family Vacation
Father's Day
Mother's Day

Sections
Book Reviews
Fathering Poems
Interviews
Fathering Fiction
Cooking Recipes
Science Fair Project
US Constitution

News
Female Offenders
Juvenile Offenders

Child Health
New Baby
Premature
Circumcision
Intersex
Signs of Puberty
Car Hazards
Child Obesity
Teen Smoking
Teen Drinking
ADD/ADHD
PCOS
Autism

Men's Health
Hair Loss
Muse ED Review
Vasectomy
Micturition
Restoration

Columns
Stephen Baskerville
Michael Childers
Kirk Daulerio
John Gill
Paul Goetz
Sam Harper
Jim Loose
Mark Phillips
Fred Reed
Carey Roberts
Glenn Sacks
Clyde Verner
Archie Wortham

Exposé
Child Support Policy
Child Support Math
Commercial Justice
Abuse Hysteria
Missing Child Money
Gender Equality?

Legal Disclaimer






Home > Importance of Fathers > Article

In Search of a History

by Richard Hiatt
Page three
Go to page one...

   Yet the distinguished historian Lawrence Goodwyn of Duke University has said that we cannot teach American history to American students. We can teach the "iconic version" filled with virtue and nobility but never a "radical" version that essentially tells the truth. "Race is the most obvious example of what I mean," Goodwyn says.

   As a result, our schools do not equip children to deal with "irreconcilable conflicts" pervasive throughout our history. Efforts to understand our country's past succumb to patriotic moralisms.

   As for the truth in education, we have yet another problem obstructing the truth. It also arrived in the 1960s. We might call it the underside of "civil rights" - or just "rights."

   The 1960s ushered in much animus toward elitism, particularly in education, and with it came an enormous panoply of student ignorance rationalized as a regard for "personal expression" and "self-esteem."

   Robert Hughes, in the Culture of Complaint, said it this way:

  Rather than "stress" the kids by asking them to read too much or think too closely, which might cause their fragile personalities to implode on contact with college-level demands, schools reduced their reading assignments,thus automatically reducing their command of language. Untrained in logical analysis, ill-equipped to develop and construct formal arguments about issues,unused to mining texts for deposits of factual material, the students fell back to the only position they could truly call their own: what they felt about things. When feelings and attitudes are the main referents of argument, to attack any position is automatically to insult its holder, or even to assail his or her perceived "rights"; every argumentum becomes ad hominem, approaching the condition of harassment, if not quite rape. "I feel very threatened by your rejection of my views on [check one]..."
   Hughes ended by saying,
   Cycle this subjectivization of discourse through two or three generations of students turning into teachers, with the sixties dioxins accumulating more each time, and you have the entropic background to our culture of complaint.

John Adams said, "There never was a democracy that did not commit suicide."


Copyright © 1998 Richard Hiatt. All rights reserved.

Other articles...



fathermag.com
The on-line magazine for men with families.



















US