Fathering Magazine for fathers, dads, family

NOTICE: This website is FOR SALE. Buy Now!

What's New
Beginners' Tour
True Stories
True Soap

New Fathers
The Joy of Fathering
Importance of Fathers
Fathers & Sons
Fathers & Daughters
Single Fathers
Second Wives -
   Second Families
Gender & Fathers
Custody & Divorce
Father Custody
Child Support
Cyber Bullying
Sex Bullies
Family Vacation
Father's Day
Mother's Day

Book Reviews
Fathering Poems
Fathering Fiction
Cooking Recipes
Science Fair Project
US Constitution

Female Offenders
Juvenile Offenders

Child Health
New Baby
Signs of Puberty
Car Hazards
Child Obesity
Teen Smoking
Teen Drinking

Men's Health
Hair Loss
Muse ED Review

Stephen Baskerville
Michael Childers
Kirk Daulerio
John Gill
Paul Goetz
Sam Harper
Jim Loose
Mark Phillips
Fred Reed
Carey Roberts
Glenn Sacks
Clyde Verner
Archie Wortham

Child Support Policy
Child Support Math
Commercial Justice
Abuse Hysteria
Missing Child Money
Gender Equality?

Legal Disclaimer

Fathering News
Check these stories:

Texas Fathers Win Again! Social workers and psychologists "incest cases" group gets foiled in court.

Therapist Loses License and One Million Dollars Another misandrist therapist gets caught selling sex fantasies to children. From the False Memory Syndrome Foundation News Letter

Supervised Parent/Child Contact An ideologue exposes her ugly compulsion to deny children's access to their father.

Study Finds Teen Pregnancy and Crime Levels are Higher Among Kids from Fatherless Homes Children reared in fatherless homes are more than twice as likely to become male adolescent delinquents or teen mothers, according to a significant new study by two economists at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

85% of Youths in Prison Grew Up in Fatherless Home Source: Texas Department of Corrections.

I Want to See My Dad! Staff of supervised visitation center demoralized by crowd of angry demonstrators.

America's Toughest Family Court Judge Speaks Out Judge says "The current biased system is run by reality-impaired ideologues."

How to Fight Sex Abuse Allegations and Win False Allegations Of Child Sexual Abuse: What You Should Know.

Child Support System Declared Unconstitutional Minnesota Supreme Court upholds ruling.

Of Statistics, Single Mothers and the Politics of Language Studies show that, overwhelmingly, children being raised in homes with both a mother and a father enjoy a lot of benefits that children from single parent homes do not.

Children in Single-Mom Households at Risk The fact that children raised by single mothers are at increased risk is found over and over again.

The Case for Father Custody Daniel Amneus makes the case for fathers getting custody of their children. "It is fatherhood which makes childhood possible."

New Single Father Suggestions Practical childcare tips for the man who has to go it alone.

Off the Boat When? Is 'child-support' just a euphemism for alimony?

VAWA: Joe Biden's Shame Family courts discriminate against men, with no value placed on justice.

Home > Child Custody & Divorce > Article

Domestic Armageddon

by Stephen Baskerville

Jeffery M. Leving with Kenneth A. Dachman, Fathers' Rights: Hard-Hitting and Fair Advice for Every Father Involved in a Custody Dispute. New York: Basic Books, 1997. ISBN 0-465-02443-2. $23.00.

Robert Seidenberg with William Dawes, The Father's Emergency Guide to Divorce-Custody Battle: A Tour Through the Predatory World of Judges, Lawyers, Psychologists, and Social Workers in the Subculture of Divorce. Takoma Park: JES Books, 1997. ISBN 0-9657062-0-6. $15.00.

It is often said in men's rights circles that a war began twenty-five years ago and only one side showed up. Today the other side is building its arsenal, and in the age of total war we may be headed for a holocaust. The vanguard of the new campaign is fathers, with two new books on fathers' rights (or the lack thereof) heralding a new political consciousness and what may well be a new civil rights movement. Both are more than the legal self-help their covers advertise. Each contains extensive essays on the politics of a court system whose quasi-totalitarian power (and proclivity) to separate children from their parents is virtually unknown except to those who become its victims.

Jeffery Leving is an attorney who writes with the assistance of a psychologist. Coming with the imprint of a major current affairs publisher, his book will likely become the authoritative work for some time. More than that, it gives a respectable imprimatur to a phenomenon that until now has been often dismissed in the press for its religious and working-class constituency (as in the "Million-Man March" or "Promise Keepers"). Poignant anecdotes and surveys document the horrifying consequences of not simply a predictable gender bias in family courts but, much more disturbingly, the virtually absolute power of mothers and courts to deprive children of their fathers with no grounds whatever. Sections on custody, child support, litigation, mediation, paternity, false accusations of abuse, along with a useful reference section make this the most complete book on its subject to date and one that deserves the accolades it has already received.

Yet for all its qualities, one flaw deprives this book of the power it might otherwise have: It seems to accept the common assumption, implicit in the oft-quoted statistics on an ever-escalating divorce rate, that the dissolution of a family begins when two consenting adults both agree to separate. Fathers receive the raw end of the custody deal, one might conclude, but at least now they know what they are getting into when they "decide" to dissolve their family.

Yet most make no such decision. The shocking statistic is not that 50% of marriages end in divorce but that some 80% are unilateral. With between 70% and 90% initiated by women, and as much as 100% in cases involving minor children, it is clear that we are in the midst of a major epidemic of maternal -- and judicial -- child-snatching.

It is here that Robert Seidenberg's book is different from anything written before. Given its local roots -- Seidenberg is head of an Arlington, Virginia fathers' rights group (which is albeit one of the largest in the country) - one might be tempted to dismiss it in light of Leving's better-publicized effort. In fact Seidenberg has produced a finely-crafted expos�of a shocking national scandal. Where Leving attributes the forced destruction of father-child bonds to outdated prejudice, Seidenberg insists that gender bias alone cannot account for virtually automatic custody awards to mothers and instead sees something akin to "racketeering." Where Leving writes entire chapters (and good ones) on mediation, Seidenberg and his legal collaborator are more categorical: "With the playing field slanted overwhelmingly in favor of the mother...Mr Dawes emphatically insists that mediation is a waste of time and money. And from what I have seen, it is hard to disagree with him."

This is not a cynical or defeatist work. Like Leving, its title and cover reflect the fact that it is marketed foremost as a reliable practical guidebook for individual fathers, and it therefore has a stake in being accurate. This makes the implicit political message all the more explosive. Seidenberg breathlessly relates some horrific tales from the Kafkaesque world of family courts: fathers who lose not only their families, but their homes, jobs, and assets; men ordered to continue support payments for children proved to be the issue of their wives' adulterous affairs; the enterprising woman collecting child support from two men while working on getting impregnated by a third; chapters with headings like "Your Lawyer, Your Enemy." The result is an eye-opening picture of a lucrative industry where lawyers are getting rich, judges are getting promoted, and wives are getting revenge (and money) -- all by ruining the lives of innocent children and their fathers.

With an unorthodox reordering of priorities, Seidenberg announces up front the most startling (and least realized) facts for those faced with the confiscation of their children: the temporary custody hearing is "the most important event in your life for the next twenty years" because its results are virtually irreversible; an enormous proportion of "separations" are in fact child snatchings and kidnappings which are generally rewarded by the courts with custody; "grounds for divorce are of no consequence" in determining custody; family courts, far from being "over-burdened" as they would have us believe, in fact issue lopsided rulings favoring the most belligerent party to encourage more litigation.

The rapacity of the legal profession is now the stuff of popular legend. Yet it is usually assumed that lawyers exploit and profit from family tragedy, but do not actually cause it. It is no longer possible to believe this. The dirty secret that emerges from this book is that courts reward child-snatching and family destruction with custody in order to generate business.

Ignorance of this central truth leads to a plethora of misconceptions, some of which are so thoroughly internalized even by fathers themselves that they continue to accept them even after falling victim to them:

It is typical for a man to believe...the media myth of the Evil Male. While he knows that he is a great father himself, he thinks everyone else is a deadbeat dad.

Similar ignorance and naivet�about the judicial system can have more severe consequences that defeat fathers almost before they start and plague them for years afterward:

Typically a father believes that the judge will give him brownie points for not "snatching" the children (that is, doing what the wife did) when he had the opportunity to.

When in fact precisely the opposite is invariably the case.

This brings us to the most disturbing, indeed terrifying, part of this book: the practical recommendations. Again, the fact that it is marketed primarily as a practical guidebook and not a political manifesto renders the sober logic of Seidenberg's advice to the embattled father all the more chilling. The most effective strategy for a father, it seems, is to imitate the technique of mothers: snatch the child; conceal the child; keep the child away from the other parent as much as possible. "Your object is to establish for as long as possible the pattern of being the sole caretaker for the children." This appalling advice is exactly what lawyers have long been counseling their female clients. In fact failure to apprise a female client of this option (like that of making knowingly false charges of abuse) may constitute malpractice according to some lawyers. Seidenberg evidently takes an analogous position: "If you do not take action, your wife will."

So, to be avuncular about it, this is what we have now come to in America. Those of us who remember the Cold War find this reminiscent of the nightmare scenario known as the "counterforce syndrome." This was where the superpowers, rather than aiming at each other's populations with the paradoxically deterrent logic of "Mutually Assured Destruction" (MAD: also perhaps a fitting analogy with divorce litigation, men's and women's groups can at least agree), target one another's nuclear strike capabilities with an accuracy that begins to make a first strike look not only logical but irresistible: the famous "race to the trigger."

This may now be the poison that is turning family discord into family destruction, with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children reporting almost 1,000 parental kidnappings in this country every day. These are still overwhelmingly maternal, but if fathers begin launching pre-emptive strikes (perhaps after reading Seidenberg), even this astounding figure could increase.

But I do not want to end on a note of gender militarism, much less of "misogyny." A proportionately smaller part of the feminist campaign involves demonstrating that women end up being exploited by unscrupulous matrimonial lawyers (and non-custodial mothers certainly do face a similar ordeal). Karen Winner's Divorced from Justice, among others, does not always resist the opposite temptation to "misandry." But if we grant their argument, perhaps it is time fathers and mothers stop arguing over who is most victimized by the "divorce industry" and come together to put an end to it.

Copyright © 1998 Stephen Baskerville
Stephen Baskerville teaches political science at Howard University.

Other pieces by this author

the on-line magazine for men with families.

The Secret Alimony Hidden in Child Support Scientific proof exists that many child support awards are too high. By Roger F. Gay.

Fathers' Rights Are Fathers' Duties Why political action is the best thing you can do for yourself, your case -- and above all your children. By Stephen Baskerville.

Domestic Armageddon Who profits from the maternal child-snatching epidemic? Two book reviews by Stephen Baskerville.

Just Let Me Be a Dad A review of Michelle D. Lovato's book of practical advice for divorcing fathers.

Men Are Beasts Whereas false accusations by women are in fact rare, occurring no more often than do other false reports of crimes, such as bank robbery -- Joint Congressional Resolution 182.

Class Dismissed Has America created a new class of citizens who are excluded from constitutional provisions regarding due process and debtors prison?

Father from Afar Fathers from afar must learn how to hear what is not said, feel what is not seen, and say what should be said.

Let No Man Put Asunder Is our traditional faith in justice being eroded by courts that operate as a child kidnapping and extortion racket?

Angels and Divorce Dean Hughson tells how a couple of angels helped save him in those critical hours following his divorce.

Gender Bias in Family Court A paralegal gives her insider's view of women who make use of the child kidnapping and extortion racketeers in our justice system.

In the Best Interest of the Child Today's fathers are more likely to seek custody. Many of them will need to prepare for a child custody evaluation.

Mother Accuses Father of Child Abuse What to do? Win! Advice from The Fathering Advisor with links to resources.

What Fathers Do Jack Kammer's story shows us how fathers affect the lives of teenage boys.

Deserted Her mother said "Your father left you because he doesn't love you." Now she has learned the truth--her loving father was forced out of her life.